A request for bail bond filed on behalf of Madam Jewel Howard-Taylor was denied on Thursday, September 24.
Criminal Court ‘C’ Judge Ousman F. Feika, denied Madam Taylor’s motion seeking to be admitted to bail in the ongoing criminal case against her.
In his ruling, Judge Feika cited the seriousness of the allegations against Madam Taylor, which prosecutors characterized as drug-related criminal conduct, and other offenses.
Madam Taylor’s legal team had argued that the charges largely relate to events, which occurred between 2021, and 2023, and that prosecuting her under the 2023 Controlled Drugs and Substances Act for conduct allegedly committed before the law took effect, would violate the constitution prohibition against ex post facto laws.
However, Judge Feika pointed to an exhibit submitted by Madam Taylor’s own lawyers, the writ of arrest, which has indicated that her relationship with an alleged cocaine cartel continued through August, 2026.
The court also relied on section 4.6 of the Criminal Procedure Law, which provides that where an offense involves a continuing course of conduct, the offense may be considered committed when the last act occurs, or when the accused terminates the alleged complicity.
The prosecution strongly opposed Madam Taylor’s request for bail. They argued that the offenses charged are grave, and are non-bailable under the 2023 Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
Prosecutors have accused the former Vice President of drug trafficking, money laundering, unlicensed importation, sale, distribution, and transportation of controlled substances, criminal conspiracy, criminal facilitation, and criminal solicitation.
In denying the bail motion, the court also made clear that Madam Taylor retains the right to challenge the prosecution’s case during trial, including whether the government can prove the elements of the offenses, establish the continuing conduct, trace the origin of the funds in question, and prove the required criminal intent.
The ruling has drawn close attention from Madam Taylor’s supporters, and members of the public as the case moves toward trial.
Despite the seriousness of the allegations, Madam Taylor remains presumed innocent unless, and until proven guilty by a competent court.
Taylor remains under detention at her residence pending further proceedings in the case.
