By Domingo Dargbeh
Montserrado County District #3 Representative, Sumo Mulbah, has directed a strong message to fellow lawmakers amid ongoing debate over the proposed removal of Representative Yekeh Y. Kolubah.
Kolubah represents the Montserrado County District #10 at the 55th Legislature.
Mulbah, who authored the formal communication seeking Kolubah’s removal, clarified that his latest statement is aimed specifically at members of the Legislature, whom he accuses of attempting to politicize the issue.
“This matter should not be reduced to politics. It is about our responsibility as lawmakers to uphold the law we enacted.” Mulbah expressed concern that some of his colleagues are framing the removal effort along party lines, rather than addressing the “legal and constitutional implications of Kolubah’s controversial” based on remark he made concerning the Liberia/Guinea border dispute. According to Mulbah, such an approach risks shielding alleged misconduct under the guise of “political solidarity.” “Insensitive remarks about our country should not be used as a tool for political convenience or protection,” he stated.
Mulbah reiterated that his push for removal is rooted in the provisions of the 1986 Constitution, particularly Article 38, which grants the Legislature authority to discipline or expel its own members.
He argued that this authority must be exercised responsibly to maintain public trust and constitutional order.
“When a legislator conduct raises serious constitutional concerns, addressing it becomes a duty, not a choice.”
While highlighting Article 11 of the constitution, Mulbah warned against creating a system where lawmakers are perceived as those above the law.
He said, accountability must apply equally to all citizens, regardless of their position in government. “If we fail to act, we risk establishing a double standard where lawmakers are exempt from the very laws they uphold.” Beyond the legal arguments, Mulbah pointed to potential national consequences, including diplomatic tensions, and security risks tied to statements about country’s territorial integrity. He also dismissed concerns about the financial cost of a potential by-election, arguing that constitutional adherence must take precedence.
“The implications of ignoring the law far outweigh any financial considerations tied to an election.” As debate continues within the Legislature, Mulbah acknowledged that the final decision rests with the plenary, where a majority vote will determine the outcome.
He, however, urged his colleagues to prioritize the rule of law over political considerations as they deliberate.